LC-MS/MS laboratory software.
Keep results in context.
KaiJun’s LC-MS/MS LIS workstream brings batch results, quality review, reagent traceability and definitive toxicology reports into a shared laboratory workflow. Explore it today with synthetic data.
Discuss your laboratoryShimadzu and SCIEX result workflows
The prototype includes synthetic CSV import workflows representing Shimadzu and SCIEX result exports. These examples let a laboratory explore batch review and result presentation before committing to an instrument-specific interface.
Live vendor interfaces, raw-data ingestion and chromatography processing are not connected. A production integration will need the actual software version and export specification, analyte identifiers, units, sample identifiers and rules for handling incomplete or repeated results.
- Synthetic result imports for both planned vendor workflows
- Batch and specimen context during result review
- Clear separation of analyzer run time and report release time
- Definitive toxicology report layouts for review
Review the batch before releasing the report
An analyte concentration needs its surrounding analytical context. KaiJun’s product direction brings quality status, exceptions and review steps alongside the batch’s results so staff can see what still needs attention.
The laboratory will define and validate acceptance criteria, review permissions and release controls for production. The demonstration does not certify a batch, decide a clinical result or replace the laboratory’s validated analytical software.
Prepared reagents, stock lots and daily maintenance
The LC-MS inventory and maintenance prototype distinguishes current stock reagent lots from reagents prepared for use in the laboratory. A preparation record can preserve the relationship between a prepared reagent and the stock materials used to make it.
Daily maintenance and temperature records sit alongside the QA workflow. The goal is to make it easier to review the evidence associated with a laboratory day or batch. Production traceability, electronic signatures, retention and audit protections remain implementation and validation workstreams.
Definitive reports with a clear chronology
The report collection includes LC-MS/MS layouts with analyte results, units, illustrative cutoffs and method notes. Instrument run dates and report release dates are displayed separately to make the sequence easier to follow.
A definitive report belongs to its own authorized test order and review. Future EMR delivery, corrected-report handling and billing handoff must preserve that context. The current SAVAS exchange is a prototype handoff, with live delivery still to be implemented.
Before you explore.
Will KaiJun work with both Shimadzu and SCIEX?
Both are planned integration targets, and synthetic import examples are available. Compatibility with a particular instrument and software version must be confirmed with vendor documentation and validated before use.
Is KaiJun a chromatography data system?
No. The current prototype is a laboratory information and reporting workflow with synthetic result imports. It does not acquire mass spectrometry data, integrate peaks or replace the instrument’s quantitation software.
Start with your workflow.
Tell us about your instruments, reporting needs and the way your laboratory works.